Milwaukee Torch vs Diablo Carbide Blade – M18 Super Sawzall

June 26, 2018 12:00 AM

While at the Milwaukee Tool NPS 2018, Milwaukee presented their new Milwaukee Torch Carbide Sawzall Blades and went head-to-head with the Freud Diablo Carbide Blade. Up until now the Diablos have been way out in front with carbide recip blade technology when it comes to cutting metal. Clearly, this Milwaukee demo provided by Milwaukee themselves, so it may certainly have some bias in the demonstration. 

This doesn’t mean the new Torch blade isn’t a great product. We’ve had a chance to try these blades out ourselves, see a previous post, Safe Cracking with Milwaukee Carbide Torch & Carbide HoleDozer. Of course we have also been huge fans of the Diablo Carbide Blades having used them in dozens of other videos over the past couple years. Twice as fast seems like a stretch, possibly for this application its accurate, we will be working on some more comprehensive testing in various materials. One thing we can say without question if you have not added someone’s Carbide Sawzall blades to your arsenal yet you are missing out!

The Torch Carbide Sawzall Blades and Diablo Carbide are available now, along with dozens of Reciprocating Saw Blade options listed at Ohio Power Tool.

Carbide Sawzall Blade vs Diablo

Visited 172 times, 1 visit(s) today
Category: Tool Reviews
   
About The Author
- Join us every Friday at 8pm EST for our weekly wrap-up of news, videos, and entertainment from the Power Tool Industry. Be sure to visit our YouTube channel to subscribe and click the notification bell, so you don't miss our weekly PLATINUM Tool Deal, that gives 25 lucky people the best tool deal online!
Previous

Quick Look: Pyramex VentureGear Clandestine Noise Reduction Headset Safety Hearing Protection
Next

Milwaukee Circular Saw Blades Demo & Saw Race (5-3/8″ – 12″) – NPS18

62 Comments

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>